I try not to treat this page as a standard weblog, but I suppose some things kind of flow out of the medium. This seems like one of those things.
See, I've been listening to the public radio again. They've got this new series called "This I Believe", where all kinds of people from all walks of life read short essays about their beliefs. I like them an awful lot. So I thought it might be interesting and useful, to myself if not for anyone else, to compile a list of things that I believe.
Some people who know me might find some of these sort of surprising. Feel free to harangue me or ask for more details – all of the comments down there at the bottom get forwarded automagically to my email.
Let me start with something I deal with on a day-to-day basis, because of my job with the wacky tabloids, and let's see where that takes me.
-----------------
Things I Believe
I believe that *something* is up with UFOs. I'm not sure what. I don't think all of them are the same, either – some are almost definitely stealth aircraft, some are almost definitely weather phenomena, and some are almost definitely neither of those two things. And a lot of the ones in that third category sure do seem to act with intelligent purpose.
I believe in the draft. Specifically, I believe that mandatory national service would be a good thing, under two conditions. First, it must be applied universally – no exemptions for anyone, regardless. And second, it should not be exclusively military. If you're entering grad school as a research chemist, spend a year or two actually researching chemistry (or just cleaning test tubes) at a government lab. Clear paths at a national park. Build housing projects. Do something.
I believe war is wrong. We as a species can take trips off the planet, plumb the depths of the ocean and replace malfunctioning organs. We can build freakin' remote controlled robots, dammit. We should be advanced enough that we don't have to go killing people to enforce national will. If somebody breaks into your house, I don't have a problem with you shooting him. If you and me and everybody we know all put on uniforms and go and shoot at him and all his buddies and everybody wearing their uniforms, I have a problem.
I believe assault weapons should be legal, and hanguns should be outlawed.
I believe that unless the U.S. drastically changes its foreign policy, especially its current trade deficit, then China will annex Taiwan within the next eight years.
I believe that there's something to most conspiracy theories, but I also believe that their true nature was revealed in the science fiction movie Cube, in which the characters are all victims of a massive conspiracy with no head, no steering force, no consistent agenda – just a blind, unstoppable bureaucratic machine.
I think most human tragedies have occurred because we tend to live within and surrounded by blind, unstoppable bureaucratic machines. Some of them have names (corporations, governments, churches), but the worst of them don't.
That said, I believe Lee Harvey Oswald was probably a patsy and definitely wasn't acting alone.
I believe that enlightened anarchy is the inevitable form of government, but that it'll only work once differences in economics and education are eliminated. So don't hold your breath for the inevitable.
I believe that people who claim to have ultimate answers are lying, and people who believe the world fundamentally breaks down into an "us" and a "them" are dangerous or evil or both. That's "ultimate" and "fundamentally" – I also believe concrete answers and arbitrary divisions are necessary to day-to-day life.
I believe in the scientific method. I also believe there is a mystery at the heart of the universe, that there is an order of intelligence greater than ours that acts as an ordering force and, thus, can be given a name, and that that name is God. I believe that kindness is the ultimate expression of that ordering force. You can't have a team if people don't play nice. I also think that there's something to the Gnostic idea that the true God's essential nature is hidden and as a result, we have to deal with all sorts of impostors and half-gods – even if we only understand them as allegories or ideas.
I believe that Jerry Falwell is following one of them. So is Osama bin Laden. So is Fred Phelps. I also believe that they each genuinely believe they're doing the right thing. That's why they're dangerous.
Finally, I believe that the most important thing we can study is consciousness, and that we really don't. We don't. I don't think we know half as much about the *way* we understand things as we do about how atoms behave or best way to get a large hunk of metal in orbit around our planet, and I think that's a little messed up. I believe a lot of the best tools to examine consciousness are currently illegal. I believe that the War on Drugs is an example of a blind, unstoppable bureaucratic machine, and it's also an example of the dangers of following a (possibly allegorical) half-god, blindly and unstoppably.
And now I believe I'll get back to work. I've got a story about earthquake prophecies from a two-headed snake spirit (no lie!) I've got to finish.
Hey Grant, what an interesting and great post.
I tend to agree with you on most things, with a slight twist.
I don't like the word "believe". I always remember that there is a "lie" in "believe".
There's a great post on Robert Anton Wilson's web site that you might be interested in (the first line is particularly good):
http://www.rawilson.com/main.shtml
"I don't believe anything, but I have many suspicions.
I strongly suspect that a world "external to," or at least independent of, my senses exists in some sense.
I also suspect that this world shows signs of intelligent design, and I suspect that such intelligence acts via feedback from all parts to all parts and without centralized sovereignity, like Internet; and that it does not function hierarchically, in the style an Oriental despotism, an American corporation or Christian theology.
I somewhat suspect that Theism and Atheism both fail to account for such decentralized intelligencce, rich in circular-causal feedback.
I more-than-half suspect that all "good" writing, or all prose and poetry that one wants to read more than once, proceeds from a kind of "alteration in consciousness," i.e. a kind of controlled schizophrenia. [Don't become alarmed -- I think good acting comes from the same place.]
I sometimes suspect that what Blake called Poetic Imagination expresses this exact thought in the language of his age, and that visits by"angels" and "gods" states it an even more archaic argot.
These suspicions have grown over 72 years, but as a rather slow and stupid fellow I do not have the chutzpah to proclaim any of them as certitudes. Give me another 72 years and maybe I'll arrive at firmer conclusions. "
Posted by: Maura McHugh on July 19, 2005 11:40 AMlove it.
you have a fluency i admire, and you seem to have given these ideas enough thought to be able to apply that fluency to getting them out of your brain and into mine.
it also helps that i agree with much of the content, i guess.
why do you like automatics, though? is that a hunting thing? i get that handguns are almost always for ending the life of someone you disagree with(however severely) but i wonder how you feel the automatics would be kept from a similar use.
harder to hide?
more expensive?
total agreement from me on the last two paragraphs, and well done for using cube to describe the conspiracy of bureaucracy... thats exactly what i used to use.
i'll have to dust off that particular conversational trope.
Thanks for your kind words.
About automatics: it's not so much that I like them as they seem to be exactly in keeping with the spirit of the Constitutional amendment granting Americans the right to bear arms. The whole idea was to keep your average citizen capable of resisting when the soldiers came a-knockin'.
Plus, it seems pretty hard to cruise down a street with an AR-15 tucked under your jacket looking for an easy mark for a mugging.
Oh, and it's not "automatics" per se, just military-style rifles that I'm thinking of. I don't really go hunting (I'm a certified hunter, but also a vegetarian), and I think there's something a little weird about a guy who uses military hardware against a deer. Not sporting.
Handguns, aesthetically, seem like a particularly unpleasant outgrowth of our convenience culture, too. They offer immediate solutions and encourage unwise responses. Fast food weaponry. Cheap and portable.
Posted by: grant on July 27, 2005 01:13 PM